George Orwell’s book, “1984” and Aldous Huxley’s, “Brave
New World,” seemed far fetched back when I read these books, but not any
more. Evidently those books have seen a
resurgence of interest lately. Let’s
just scope in on one area of change.
With
genetic engineering we can almost design our offspring to fit our preferences.
Women can carry and have a baby for someone else. I remember reading about a pregnant man. Talk about a guy who needs a group hug…or a
lobotomy. Women can have a litter by taking a pill. Can you imagine the feeding frenzy when eight
little suckers fight for a nozzle on the “Octomom?” Remember her?
She’s the woman who spit out an entire litter in one sneeze.
I’ll bet
they’re working on a process to create a new species of computerized
quasi-humans. Some of us already have
mechanical parts. My new knee starts
walking when I’m asleep. If I had two,
I’d probably find myself half-way to town before I woke up. I’ve kicked poor old Dakota off the bed more
than once. I don’t know where Gayle
went.
We are
coming up with all kinds of innovative techniques to modify who and what we
are. Mel Brooks said, “It’s good to be
king.” Some people go further and say,
“It’s good to be God.” Evidently God
didn’t get it right.
Michael
Jackson changed from a black man into a white woman. Based
on his jerky body movements, he may have actually been a hyperkinetic robotic
clone. In some ways we are going beyond
Huxley’s, “Brave New World” and Orwell’s predictions. It won’t be long before we won’t know who is 100%
human and who is a mechanical clone.
I just read
a news item where robot sex is currently under development. These creations look and feel human,
according to one report. The cost of these machines may be off-set by the fact
that a man won’t have to pay for dinner, wine, flowers, and all the other “preliminary”
stuff and women won’t need to pretend to be in love. Just press the right button and they’re ready
to go, which is not much of a change when you think about it.
The
definition of marriage has been broadened to the point that someone might actually
marry one of those “humanoid” machines. I’m
not sure why a man would want to take the chance that a divorce could give his ex-robot
his house and half his retirement. And
what would a woman gain from divorce from a robot? Maybe a mechanical arm and a leg. It’s safer to just buy one of these things on
EBay and stay uncommitted.
They say
that you will be able to design your own robotic “partner.” You can pick
height, sex, body dimensions, facial characteristics, hair color, and even
whether or not you want them to talk.
That “talk” option on the order form would rarely be checked by men
unless he could program the exact dialogue, like, “You’re wonderful.” “You’re the only man I’ve ever loved”- goofy
stuff like that.
I’ll bet
that when a woman chooses her ideal robot man, his vocabulary would be limited
to, “It’s my fault” and “I’m sorry.” Human
husbands learn these two phrases early.